Fact-Checking Was Too Good for Facebook
The social network has given up on verifying facts. That’s a good thing.
How Meta’s Removal Of Fact-Checking Impacts Content Creators
Meta's removal of fact-checking reshapes digital trust and responsibility. What it means for creators, audiences, and the ...
Meta says end of fact-checking hasn’t impacted ad spend
Meta says its controversial decision to put an end to its fact-checking program hasn't impacted advertiser spend. On its Q4 ...
Washingtonian on MSN18d
What Does a Fact-Check-Free Facebook Mean for Trump’s America?
This year’s Inauguration Day seating chart crammed a whole lot of Silicon Valley into Washington: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, and X owner Elon Musk ...
Al Jazeera English1mon
Meta, Facebook to drop fact-checkers: What does this mean for social media?
Meta owned social media platforms ends third-party fact-checking, adopting community notes as its replacement.
PC Magazine3y
fact checking
Snopes.com, PolitiFact.com and FactCheck.org are prominent fact checking sites. See disinformation. THIS DEFINITION IS FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY. All other reproduction requires permission.
Scientific American25d
Does Fact-Checking Work? Here’s What the Science Says
Nature spoke to communication and misinformation researchers about the value of fact-checking, where perceived biases come from and what Meta’s decision could mean. In terms of helping to ...
What does the end of the Meta fact-checking program mean for truth?
Mark Zuckerberg recently announced that Meta will remove fact-checking on all of its platforms, including Facebook and Instagram. Instead, the platforms will rely on users to flag misinformation.